On 6/5/06, Jorge Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > hi, could anyone tell me will SQLAlchemy replace SQLObject with TG in
> > future?
> so far that's the plan
>
> > I want to create a new website and I need the best choice.
> > thanks.
>
> right now so, eventually tg will provide a way to migrate.
Surely you're talking about the far future (TG 2.0+), riiiiiight?
right now on trac the milestone is 1.1b although must stuff for 1.1b are just "future"
-- Andy
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
- [TurboGears] SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Olli Wang
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Steve Zatz
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Andrew Grover
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Jorge Vargas
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Max Ischenko
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Robin Haswell
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? spacetaxi
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? mikl
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? spacetaxi
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLOb... mikl
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or S... Jonathan LaCour
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Kevin Dangoor
- [TurboGears] Re: SQLAlchemy or SQLObject? Adam Jones

