Em Terça 13 Junho 2006 12:24, Patrick Maupin escreveu: > TurboGears/Buffet side and the template engine side). Color me naive > and idealistic if you wish, but it seems that a goal of such a project > would be documentation that allowed at least a chance at a working > cleanroom design (even if implementation/debugging issues necessitated > examining another implementation). This is why I have concentrated on > carefully reading the documentation itself, and looking for ambiguities > and inconsistencies. (I understand that people have real work to do > and that the documentation is sometimes considered a necessary evil. > If that's the way it is, well OK, but if not, I would like to think > that my original questions could be taken as constructive criticism of > the documentation.)
Documentation is being done and is the greatest problem now. We don't have 1.0 because we don't have docs. -- Jorge Godoy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
