On Thu, 27 Jul 2006, Jorge Vargas wrote: > On 7/26/06, John J Lee <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: [...] >> and the constraints of strict backwards-compatibility. As a useable web >> framework, though, this is of course vapourware, unlike GWT! > > > I don't agree that GWT is not vapourware, GWT is there because someone at > google wanted it to be, not because people use it everyday, on the other
My definition of "vapourware" is "software that doesn't yet exist in useable form". By that definition, seems that GWT is not vapourware, but my theoretical TG+pyjamas most certainly is. > hand TG is here because of Kevin but is still here and growing because we > are using it, and will keep using it. I didn't mean to say TG itself is vapourware! Only TG+pyjamas (or any Python GWT work-alike). Sorry, what I wrote was ambiguous. > And hey, Guido (creator of Python) is doing web development at Google, so >> who knows where that might lead!-) > > who knows, but I don't think he is developing a webframework.... [...] Sure, I wasn't really serious there. I imagine he's got his hands quite full enough with Python 2.5, Python 3, and whatever Google has him doing... John --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
