[TurboGears] Re: @view?

[Eric Larson]

One thing I don't really like about not use @expose is that it is changing the basic default of cherrypy methods. I believe one of TurboGears strengths is how it uses other libraries. This is beneficial because looking at the CherryPy docs or Kid docs applies almost directly to TurboGears. By changing the names of the basic methods like this, it makes it difficult to see how CherrPy integrates within TG, which in turn means that the wealth of documentation available for one library may become useless.

Just my two cents.

Eric

On 8/6/06, Jorge Vargas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

On 8/5/06, Yves-Eric Martin < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Lee McFadden wrote:
> What's wrong with the current decorator?

there is nothing wrong with it, it's a mather of taste.

 Is the @expose decorator
broke?

no

Or is this all just about finding a way to introduce the word
"view" in the TG terminology?

yes

Basically Bruce Eckel, made a good point that there is no explicit view from MVC in turbogears.
 
I remenber when i first quickstarted a project I grance around the folders and came to the conclusion templates was the view because everything else was other things.

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to turbogears@googlegroups.com
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---