This discussion has been good, because I think we've at least gotten everyone on the same page as to what all belongs in the view layer of TG. And there's been a lot of good input from people about how they want to express it.
I was just thinking a little about what we're going to need in the view layer in First Class and I think it likely that First Class is going to require some new functionality to do what we need to do in the view layer. I think our best bet is to leave things as-is for now, because a good API will likely shake out naturally as First Class takes shape. What we have now may not be optimal in its mapping to the well-known Model View Controller names, but it is clear enough that no one will be thrown off for more than a minute :) Kevin On Aug 8, 2006, at 1:57 AM, Jorge Godoy wrote: > > "Max Ischenko" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > >> Call me old-fashioned but I don't like extra magic with pathnames to >> make it work. I'd prefer 1:1 mapping between file path and dotted >> view >> name: > > Me too. --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
