On 10/08/06, Kevin Dangoor <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> On Aug 10, 2006, at 8:10 AM, Robin Bryce wrote:
>
> > I didn't realy understand why not having a dependency on ElementTree
> > was a good thing. I mean, how hard can it be to patch cElementTree to
> > give line numbers and handle comment processing in c ?
>
> Apparently, it's hard enough, since no one has done it.

Well line numbers wasn't to hard: sf #1538691. Wonder what subtelty
I'm missing ;-)

On 10/08/06, Christopher Lenz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> There's simply not much benefit of using ElementTree in Markup. ET is,
> after all, a DOM-style API, whereas Markup uses SAX-style streaming
> internally.
>
> Furthermore, in my (not very extensive) tests using cElementTree with
> Kid doesn't make a huge difference compared to using the Python
> ElementTree implementation. Kid spends most of the time in its own code
> ;-)

Fair enough :-). And I definitely respect what your doing with Markup

Cheers,

Robin

--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---

Reply via email to