Kevin Dangoor wrote: >On Sep 4, 2006, at 2:13 AM, jose wrote: > > > >>Why only an appendix about SQLAlchemy? I supposed SA is to become the >>default ORM in the next versione of TG. =-O >> >> > >There are a couple of reasons for this. > >1) SQLObject is still the standard, and the book cover 1.0 >2) SQLAlchemy has very good docs as it is > >With #2, I'm not saying that there's no place for a book covering it. >I'm just saying that it's not as critical as it was to get good >SQLObject coverage. > >I'm not certain which version of TurboGears will be the first to have >SQLAlchemy as the default ORM. Support for SQLAlchemy will get >stronger and stronger with each release until it becomes a natural >transition. (Use of SQLAlchemy today is kind of like "from __future__ >import SQLAlchemy". > > This seems to me that you are preparing to write a [future] book where people can read about [past] things. :-\
jo --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
