Robin Haswell wrote: > What's odd though is that my custom objects using one_to_many seem to > work fine. If Jonathan LaCour (sp?) has no clues I'll set up my own > many_to_many and see if it makes a difference.
I see similar odd results. It looks like it works fine when I test similar relationships built in classes outside of TurboGears, but for some reason there is a problem with the specific ones in TurboGears. I am not exactly sure why this is, but it looks like it was fixed by not using ActiveMapper for now, which is fine. Its less readable, but it certainly works :) BTW, for those of you who are curious, there is some good stuff coming with ActiveMapper soon. I have been looking for someone to take it to the next level, since I want to dedicate my time to some other projects and I think I may have found someone who wants to take it in a very interesting direction that could benefit TurboGears. I'll let you all know how it all pans out! -- Jonathan LaCour http://cleverdevil.org --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
