> The thing about the full stack frameworks is that they make a lot of > decisions for you. Many experienced Python developers don't like > CherryPy, particularly the dispatch. Others don't like Kid. If you're > not making use of widgets, error handling, identity, or the toolbox, > then there's no reason you can't roll your own framework with Paste. > This is basically what Pylons and CleverHarold are. > > The goal for 1.1 (as I understand it) is to make TG a wsgi-based > framework and to break up the TG pieces into self-contained units so > that they can be reused in other wsgi-based frameworks.
That sounds very cool. Does that mean one would be able to unplug CherryPy from the middle and use Pylons or Rhubarb Tart if they are more appropriate for the task at hand? I realize this must make docs a lot harder, but it makes for a more attractive advanced tool kit in my books. Iain --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
