iain duncan wrote:
> Hi folks, I found this handy cheat on line to make do without ternary
> operators until py 2.5 is readily available on commodity hosting:
>
> ( answer1, answer2 )[ boolean_condition ]
> - evaluates to answer2 if boolean_condition true, else answer1
I always use (boolean_condition and answer1 or answer2). I.e. for
py:attrs="{'checked': value==7 and 'checked' or None}" for your
checkboxes.
> The <= makes kid choke on a bad tag. Seems to me kid should recognize
> that <>'s inside a py expression should be ignored. Which if does for >=
> but *not* <=.
>
> The bottom of the traceback I get is:
>
> File "/usr/lib/python2.4/site-packages/kid-0.9.3-py2.4.egg/kid/pull.py",
> line 414, in feed
> raise e
> ExpatError: not well-formed (invalid token): line 77, column 81
>
use < as your <, or reverse the operators and make it so it's
always doing a greater than operation. This is even more fun when
you're dealing with javascript less than operations.
Joseph
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
