On 7月20日, 上午8時24分, venomous <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Hello,
> with tg1 we can use argument and keywords in function, so in my
> opinion we have great flexibility for managing several request on each
> function.
> Now from what i have read, TG2 will be based on pylons, or better will
> be build on top of pylons.>From what i have seen the url dispatching of
> pylons,routes, doesn't
>
> allow the usage of keywords, from what i have seen fro the example,
> the coding style is totally different from turbogears.
> So in very few words, how much i will need to work in future in order
> to port my tg1 app to tg2?
> How much the coding style will differ from how we write now function
> in tg1?
> Hope those aren't fool question.
> Thanks in advance.
Hi,
I've summarized parts of the changes between 1.x and 2.0 on doc wiki.
check http://docs.turbogears.org/2.0/RoughDocs/WhatsNew
At least you could check the real code in svn (controller/root.py)
http://trac.turbogears.org/browser/projects/ToolBox2/trunk
toolbox2 is the project which had ported toolbox arch to tg2.
--
Fred
--~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups
"TurboGears" group.
To post to this group, send email to [email protected]
To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For more options, visit this group at
http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en
-~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
