le 23.11.2007 16:15 Jonathan Schemoul a écrit: > I have the same problem... > I started a project two weeks ago, and found support for SA and Genshi > very poor so I decided to go SO & kid. > > I started to use TG about a year ago and decided to use SA and Kid. SA because it seemed to be more promising than SO (personnal conclusion at that time). Now, I use SA through elixir which gives a very easy way to deal with SA on most (all ?) the cases I have to handle.
> This project is huge and will (hopefully) be a very high traffic web > app. > > However, will the migration to 2.0 be possible with SO and kid ? > > By the way, very good work guys, I enjoy working with TG... I code > really quickly with it :) > > Cheers, > Jonathan > -- > http://english.jondesign.net/ > > On 23 nov, 13:45, "Yo'av Moshe" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> Hey, >> Since my database isn't too complicated, I guess using SO will be okay >> for my needs. Also, I really like Catwalk and the Model Designer and >> it seems like fun to use. Besides, I trying SA for the last couple of >> hours and can't get some of the basic things to work. This all leads >> me to using SO, but still I'd like to make sure - how will TG2 support >> SO? what features will I miss? Will at some time in the future I'll >> need to migrate to SA? >> >> Thanks again! >> >> Yo'av. >> >> On Nov 23, 2:18 pm, "Roger Demetrescu" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> On Nov 23, 2007 8:13 AM, Florent Aide <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> >>>> On Nov 23, 2007 11:14 AM, iain duncan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>>> >>>>> If you decide to use SA, I'd recommend starting with 0.3 installed in a >>>>> virtual env for isolation and work through Lee McFadden's excellent >>>>> tutorials ( the Splee Blog series ) >>>>> >>>> I am not sure here. Maybe 0.3 could be interesting, but 0.4 final is >>>> well documented and supported since TG 1.0.4b2 (beta versions of SA >>>> were supported before that). I would tend to say that since you chose >>>> SA in the first place you are not afraid of complexity and are after >>>> power and flexibility. >>>> In that case _I_ would go for 0.4.0 final (I did not test 0.4.1 yet). >>>> But this is just a personal feeling, not an authoritative answer. >>>> >>> Complementing: >>> >>> If you are using SA 0.4.1 and @paginate, you will need to wait for TG >>> 1.0.4b3 >>> (or get it from SVN) because of this: (extracted from CHANGELOG): >>> >>> ----- >>> * Fix pagination of SQLAlchemy Query ordering by backrefs and synonyms' >>> attributes. It also supports SQLAlchemy 0.4.1, which removed the >>> ``properties`` accessor on Mapper (#1582). >>> ----- >>> >>> If you want to use SA 0.4.1 with paginate and TG 1.0.4b2, you will >>> need to change 1 line of code from TG's paginate.py, as described at >>> the end of ticket #1582 [1] >>> >>> Cheers, >>> >>> Roger >>> >>> [1] -http://trac.turbogears.org/ticket/1582 >>> > > > --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
