2009/2/4 Jorge Vargas <jorge.var...@gmail.com>: >>> > I want my application to only use HTTPS. TG itself can not do this. Is >>> > it better to use Apache or Stunnel to make my TG application use HTTPS? >>> >>> I tend to use Apache with mod_rewrite as a front end to my TG >>> applications. Apache can handle any SSL connections as well as serve >>> any static content. You might also want to look into mod_wsgi. >> >> Using Apache (or mod_wsgi) is a lot more work as using Stunnel (I >> think). Is there a benefit for using them instead of Stunnel? > > pretty much all the benefits of using a real web server. Stability, > static files, auth, encryption, reliability, scalability, etc.
TG itself is not a real webserver? Maybe I'll start with Stunnel. (The application is not used much at the moment.) And change it later to Apache or mod_wsgi. -- Cecil Westerhof --~--~---------~--~----~------------~-------~--~----~ You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "TurboGears" group. To post to this group, send email to turbogears@googlegroups.com To unsubscribe from this group, send email to turbogears+unsubscr...@googlegroups.com For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/turbogears?hl=en -~----------~----~----~----~------~----~------~--~---
