Unfortunately I don't have any funding available to me, I'm going to have
to play with this a bit more
On Dec 14, 2015 4:12 PM, "DRC" <[email protected]> wrote:

> What you're asking is straightforward, but since it is specific to your
> deployment scenario, I can't do the work for free.  Contact me off-list
> if you are interested in pursuing it as a funded development/consulting
> opportunity.
>
>
> On 12/14/15 4:20 PM, Logan McNaughton wrote:
> > I understand why you need some sort of authentication to limit user
> > access, I thought there might be some trick though....
> >
> > Using /etc/pam.d/sshd doesn't work, I've tried /etc/pam.d/system-auth
> > and some others. I am using pam_krb5 for authentication. The problem is
> > that when "pam_end()" is called, it destroys the Keberos tickets,
> > because Xvnc doesn't create a PAM "session", pam_krb5 doesn't keep the
> > key cache, it destroys it.
> >
> > I'm going to start playing with getting Xvnc to use xinetd and launch
> > GDM, I'm pretty sure as long as they are able to type their password
> > into GDM, it'll keep the ticket cache (because GDM creates a PAM
> session).
> >
> > It would be helpful if VNC (I've tried Tiger and Turbo) created a PAM
> > session when the used connected, and ended the session when they
> > disconnect, but I assume that would be a bit of work.
> >
> > On Mon, Dec 14, 2015 at 3:10 PM, DRC <[email protected]
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> >     The user ACL function only works with the PAM User/Password
> >     authentication method (which can be used with the "Plain" or "Unix
> >     Login" authentication schemes.)  The user ACL is checked against the
> >     username that is submitted as part of the Plain/Unix Login auth
> process.
> >        There is really no way to perform that check using any other
> >     authentication scheme, because no other authentication scheme
> provides a
> >     username (well, OK, Ident does, but it doesn't provide a password.
> It's
> >     meant as a way for the viewer to interface with VNC proxies, not as a
> >     security mechanism.)  If a user authenticates using a VNC password
> or no
> >     authentication, then the TurboVNC Server has no idea which user is
> >     attempting to connect.
> >
> >     It seems like the problem you're trying to solve is:  how to prevent
> one
> >     user from connecting to another user's VNC session, but without using
> >     authentication.  And hopefully when I phrase it that way, you'll
> realize
> >     why it's impossible.  The VNC session has to be authenticated
> somehow,
> >     because that's the only way to restrict access to it.
> >
> >     You can use no authentication along with SSH tunneling, and you can
> >     restrict connections to localhost (thus forcing all connections to be
> >     made through SSH.)  However, this doesn't prevent user1 from
> connecting
> >     to user2's VNC session, as long as both user1 and user2 have a valid
> >     account on the server.  I know we have some deployments that are
> using
> >     SSH, so hopefully one of those SysAdmins can chime in with more
> >     information regarding how they implement user isolation in such an
> >     environment (assuming they do.)  At the moment, the only way I know
> how
> >     to do this without requiring the user to log in twice is to use a
> >     one-time password.  For instance, if you're deploying the viewer
> from a
> >     portal, then the portal can generate an OTP on the TurboVNC Server,
> then
> >     it can pass that OTP to the Java viewer via a .jnlp (Java Web Start)
> >     file, or it can create a .vnc connection profile on the fly, pass the
> >     OTP in that profile, and download it to the client machine, where it
> >     will be opened in the standalone TurboVNC Viewer.  Basically, the
> portal
> >     controls user isolation, because the users have to log into the
> portal
> >     using their Unix login credentials.  The portal then exposes only the
> >     user's running sessions, allowing them to generate on-the-fly OTPs
> and
> >     connect only to those sessions.
> >
> >     In order to really limit the Xvnc instances on a per-user basis
> without
> >     using (additional) authentication, it would be necessary for the
> >     TurboVNC Server to more tightly integrate with the SSH server--
> probably
> >     requiring some sort of scheme whereby the remote end of the SSH
> tunnel
> >     can automatically pass authentication credentials to the VNC server,
> or
> >     whereby the VNC server can use an existing Kerberos ticket.
> >
> >     But as far as why the Plain authentication scheme isn't generating
> >     Kerberos tickets, have you tried using a different value for
> >     pam-service-name?  The default PAM service we use
> (/etc/pam.d/turbovnc)
> >     probably isn't creating the necessary tickets, but if you use
> >     "pam-service-name = sshd", for instance, I'll bet that it would.
> >
> >
> >     On 12/14/15 2:00 PM, Logan McNaughton wrote:
> >     > Here is my situation:
> >     >
> >     > My current users login to the :0 display using a different remote
> >     > desktop product. They are presented with the GDM login when they
> open a
> >     > session.
> >     >
> >     > When they login (authenticated using Kerberos) they are given a
> Kerberos
> >     > ticket, which allows them to SSH to other machines in our
> environment
> >     > without a password.
> >     >
> >     > I am creating a VNC launcher, (the "vncserver" command is run for
> the
> >     > user when they click "launch" for a machine in a list)
> >     >
> >     > When using VNC "Plain" authentication, they can authenticate via
> >     > Kerberos, but they aren't given a ticket (I presume it is because
> >     > Xserver/VNC doesn't create a session).
> >     >
> >     > I can get around this by connecting via an SSH tunnel, when I do
> that,
> >     > the SSH session creates the Kerberos ticket. Problem solved,
> almost.
> >     >
> >     > If I use an SSH tunnel and "Plain", they are prompted for their
> >     > username/password to SSH into the machine, and then again for the
> >     > "Plain" authentication.
> >     >
> >     > I want to be able to use an SSH tunnel + "None" authentication, and
> >     > limit the users that can connect to the session to only the user
> that
> >     > owns the "Xvnc" process. Is there any way to do this?
> enable-user-acl is
> >     > only respected if you use "Password" or "Plain" authentication.
> >
> >
>  
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >     _______________________________________________
> >     TurboVNC-Users mailing list
> >     [email protected]
> >     <mailto:[email protected]>
> >     https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users
> >
> >
> >
> >
> >
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> >
> >
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > TurboVNC-Users mailing list
> > [email protected]
> > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users
> >
>
>
> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------
> _______________________________________________
> TurboVNC-Users mailing list
> [email protected]
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users
>
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
_______________________________________________
TurboVNC-Users mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/turbovnc-users

Reply via email to