Trieloff, Carl wrote: > > How does SCA integrate with JMX/ and deal with dynamic configuration? Does it > define a model > or is it up to the implementer? >
To my knowledge this is an area the spec has not yet addressed although a common management model would seem to be a good idea (not just for JMX but also WS-DM or SNMP). There is an API for the static model metadata through the ModuleContext but IMO it still needs some spec work. In Tuscany we currently have the static model of the configuration (in the model module) and the intent is to instrument the runtime components for a more dynamic model (e.g. service throughput). I don't think we would create a hard dependency on JMX (e.g. by extending MBean classes) but would use a bridge between the runtime and the MBeanServer. -- Jeremy
