Mike Edwards wrote:
Sebastien,
I can see the advantage of this from a development perspective, so I'm
OK with it.
However, when we eventually deliver binary builds, I'd hope that all
the binary tools would end up in one place since end-users may not
easily see the distinctions between the different tools.
Yours, Mike.
Jean-Sebastien Delfino wrote:
I need to drop 2 new sub-projects for our wsdl2java command-line tool
and maven plugin. I'm thinking about using a structure similar to
what we have under sdo.
java/sca/tools
java/sca/plugin
We have a java/tools folder but I would prefer to have these tools
under java/sca, and then just remove the java/tools folder which is
empty at the moment. What do people think?
Yes I agree with you that in a binary build the different binary tools
should end up in one place
Ok then, I'll create the WSDL2Java tools and plugin modules under java/sca.
--
Jean-Sebastien
