-0 on ordaining some kind of "official" priority for functional equivalency with M1 -- my opinion is that at this stage in the project (ie, incubation), developer community is significantly more important than user community. I'd rather we take a more free form stance with respect to encouraging development in areas people find compelling (including of course, the porting of functionality from M1).
On 7/18/06, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
It is true that users who just want a working binary download have the M1 release to work with. However, the Tuscany community itself will benefit from being able to run end to end scenarios to exercise code that they contribute to the new trunk. So if we do make this switch now, I believe that we need to focus as a community on getting the new trunk into a state where it can run end to end scenarios with comparable functionality to what we had previously in M1. I'd feel more comfortable if I saw comments on this list agreeing that this should be the priority immediately following the switch. Simon Rick wrote: > For me the vote said it all; its good to go to switch. I think I can > understand your position and probably would side with you if it wasn't > for two things: We have a release so users just wanting to understand > SCA and the basics of Tuscany have something stable to work with. Also > this is just a switch, the head of the trunk should be preserved in a > branch. Just before the switch I would recommend both have tags too. > Doing this doesn't stop any discussion, it doesn't stop bringing > function/code from the current head back in to Chianti; it even doesn't > prevent in the case community decides we prefer to switch back. > > Simon Nash wrote: > >> Jeremy, >> Before you do this, I'd prefer to see some discussion about the >> functional differences between chianti and the current trunk code >> and how we would see these being addressed, as I said in my >> previous email on this subject. What do you (or others) think >> about this? >> >> Simon >> >> Jeremy Boynes wrote: >> >>> With the vote in favour of switching, I am about to start moving >>> chianti into trunk. I will move the current sca parts into a branch >>> (branches/pre-chianti) and move the chianti code into trunk. I will >>> make the version in the poms 1.0-SNAPSHOT like the SDO tree. >>> >>> I expect to complete this tomorrow or possibly Wed if there are >>> build issues. If anyone has a bunch of uncommitted changes or a big >>> patch for submission please speak up soon to avoid merge issues. >>> >>> Thanks >>> -- >>> Jeremy >>> >>> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >>> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >>> >>> >>> >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
--------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
