Is the spec group pulling proposals from Tuscany wiki? If not, maybe we need to push the proposals to the spec group and we may need a process.
On 7/19/06, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Jul 19, 2006, at 9:31 AM, Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > When we implement Tuscany, once a while we run into issues/holes/ > missing features in the SCA spec (SDO in some cases). I'm wondering > if we have an open source endorsed process on how to deal with such > issues. Because they may impact the programming model (the way how > users use SCA or SDO), I think we should be extra cautious on > making decisions. > > Here're a list of things I can see: > > 1) Capture the requirement (problem statement) > 2) Make proposals (could be more than one, maybe with prototypes in > sandbox?) > 3) Reach consenus in the community by discussions > 4) Present the proposal to the spec group > 5) Conclude if it will be become an official spec feature (if > accepted by the spec group) or a tuscany-specific extension (we > should use tuscany namespace to model SCDL extensions if required) > 5) Make changes in the code base with an agreed solution > > I suggest that we keep track of them on the Tuscany wiki site. > > What do you guys think? Sounds good. I did something like this for the CDI proposal - there is a page on the wiki at: http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/SpecProposals -- Jeremy --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Yang ZHONG
