Thinking a little more, using the ImplementationProcessor mechanisms
seems like a better way to tackle this. One major advantage would be
that we could add metadata to the service contract based on data type
or annotations (e.g. adding metadata saying that a parameter should
be bound using SDO which could be detected through the marker
interface or an @SDO annotation).
I have a head full of WSDL stuff atm so I'll open a JIRA so we don't
forget.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:31 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
Perhaps - this just seemed real simple.
--
Jeremy
On Aug 12, 2006, at 6:19 PM, Jim Marino wrote:
Jeremy,
I haven't had time to look at this carefully but would it be
better to have InterfaceJavaIntrospector be an
ImplementationProcessor since the component type information for
POJOs is compiled there?
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
