Excellent stuff... another thing that we haven't got around to yet. I'm still playing around with different ways of making pluggable extensions so I'll just merge what you check in with what I'm looking at.
Cheers, On 24/08/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I'm going to leave the SupplyChain scenario alone for a day or two, to leave people time to take a look at it, comment and see if/how the SCDL artifacts can be simplified or done better before integrating the actual implementation logic of the supplychain management components. In the meantime, I'm starting to make changes to the SCDL model in tuscany::sca::model to match the logical model for the 0.95 "recursive composition" SCDL. This will bring the model classes closer to the diagram I had posted a while back: http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/sandbox/sebastien/cpp/diagrams/service.jpg. This will include the following changes: - finish aligning the model classes with the 0.95 terminology - separate component and component type - support multiple instances of a type configured differently - refactor subsystem/module into composite - support for includes I'll adjust the rest of the runtime as necessary to keep it building and working, but I'll try to minimize the changes, and will leave TODO comments where I feel that more work is required later. I should be able to start checking in some of the changes at the end of the day or tomorrow. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
