Hi Rania, In the M1 code the WS entryPoint ignores the endpoint value of the port in the WSDL, it is as you say: http:/[host]:[portnum]/[name of webapps subdirectory]/services/[entry point name]
The readme for helloworlde4xws actually says use the helloworldjsclient not the helloworldwsclient (thats _js_ not _ws_). That JavaScript client has separate buttons to invoke the e4x or ws samples. If you look at the sca.module file for the helloworldjsclient you'll see it has separate externalService definitions for each web service it uses and thats where the different endpoints are defined. The service name is optional in a reference if the component only exposes a singe service so it was left off in the sample to keep things simple. ...ant On 8/18/06, Rania Khalaf <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, I have two quick questions about how the M1 helloworld e4x sample is working. Basically, the naming conventions seem off which is quite confusing. I was looking at the M1 samples in order to understand how the URLs are created for deployed WS. It was under the impression that it is: http:/[host]:[portnum]/[name of webapps subdirectory]/services/[entry point name] 1) the e4x hellworld sample uses the same url in its port as that for the pojo helloworld sample: location=" http://localhost:8080/sample-helloworldws/services/HelloWorldWebService"; It also says to use the same client as the POJO sample. Why is that not 'helloworlde4xws' after the port number since that is the name of the webapps dir where this sample is? 2)The reference element in an entry point is usually componentName/serviceName. The helloworld pojo sample does that exactly, using: <reference>HelloWorldServiceComponent/HelloWorldService</reference> But the E4X one drops the service name (even though it does define it in its componentType side file) in its reference element: <reference>HelloWorldComponent</reference> Can anyone please clarify whether the sample is correct, and if so how come it works ? Maybe: things defaulting to certain values somewhere ? is there a precedence order for clashing URLs? is the port element ignored altogether ? are we supposed to only deploy one or the other of the ws samples and use the same directory name in the tomcats webapps dir ? thanks, Rania --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
