Hi Jim / Jeremy, I put the RMIHost in the spi precisely for reasons that Jeremy pointed out. Aslo with ServletHost already there I assumed that this would be the way we would go and hence put it there.
So now shall I move it over to the host-api? Thanks - Venkat On 8/28/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Aug 27, 2006, at 11:26 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote: > Not every type - just those that we have tried to define a host > interface for. They will be in the Tuscany namespace anyway, it's > just a question of whether they are together in the host-api jar, > or spread amongst a load of other very small jars. > > How about we say that it's OK to add them to host-api provided they > only depend on "standard" interfaces (such as javax.rmi, javax.jms, > org.osgi) rather than on any implementation of those interfaces? > "Non-standard" ones (that introduced a dependency on something such > as JINI or say a specific JMS implementation) would go into > separate modules. > > We can then mark the dependencies as "provided" as they are likely > to be present in the host environment anyway (e.g. any J2EE server > will automatically provide most of javax...). > That works for me. Jim > -- > Jeremy > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
