Thanks Rajith
I have a question on the thought behind sca:databinding. In Tuscany
we have a databinding framework that allows us to convert between
different data formats on a wire - for example, a component can call
out using a SDO to a component that is expecting a JAXB object and
the framework would automatically handle the conversion between the
two. We also do that for physical bindings to convert between the
binding's native data representation the that expected by the
component - for example, the Axis2 binding uses AXIOM as its
representation and we use the framework to convert to/from thet POJOs
(or SDOs, JAXBs, etc.) expected by components.
For JMS, I assume the native format would be a javax.jms.Message -
how do you see the relationship between sca:databinding specified in
the binding and our databinding framework? Does the user need to
specify an sca one, or could they just leave it to use to convert the
message using our framework?
--
Jeremy
On Sep 13, 2006, at 11:54 AM, Rajith Attapattu wrote:
Hi All,
I would like to propose a binding based on JMS and the details are
captured
in the wiki.
http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/SCA_Java/JMSBinding
Please check it out and I would like to hear everybodys thoughts on
this.
Thanks,
Rajith
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
