That did it. Thanks. All the build configurations have the Working Directory set correctly and the tests run successfully out of the box.
Regards, Geoff. On 29/09/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
No probs - it's in. Cheers Andy On 9/29/06, Geoffrey Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I tried that and it fixes one instance, but there are at least 4! I've > attached the .suo file from my working stdcxx case to the 724 JIRA. Could > you apply that and see what we get? > > Thanks > > Geoff. > > On 29/09/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Hi Geoff, > > > > Looks like it's the projectsvc7/tucany_sdo/tuscany_sdo.suo file that > > holds this info. Unfortunately it's in some binary format which makes > > management of it via svn harder as binary files don't get included in > > patches. I've put it up with the Working Directory property set - let > > me know if it works OK, or pass me your version & I'll commit that > > instead. > > > > Cheers > > Andy > > > > > > > > On 9/28/06, Geoffrey Winn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > In JIRA 724 I contributed changes to SDO for C++ to make stdcxx a build > > > option, specifically by adding new build configurations for release and > > > debug builds. Unfortunately, the effect of applying that patch is to > > damage > > > all of the build configurations for MS VC 7.1. > > > > > > The problem is that before the patch was applied, all the build > > > configurations set the "Working Directory" property of the Debugging > > pane to > > > "..\..\..\runtime\core\test". Since the patch was applied, that field is > > > blank - not just in the 2 new configurations that I added, but also in > > the > > > two that were there before. Therefore, the tests all fail because they > > are > > > running in the wrong directory. My patch modified the tuscany_sdo.sln > > file > > > and also the sdo_runtime.vcproj and sdo_test.vcproj files. The build > > tree > > > that was the source of that patch does still have the Working Directory > > > property set correctly and yet the current tree does not. I'm puzzled. I > > > can't find where that property is stored, even in the source tree where > > it > > > works. Does anyone have any idea where that property is recorded because > > > presumably that is the thing I need to check in to complete this change? > > > > > > Regards, > > > > > > Geoff. > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
