OK. Name chosen: <package>-1.0-incubator-M2 Thanks all!
On 10/5/06, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Makes sense to keep the naming convention consistent across Tuscany. On 10/5/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Pete Robbins wrote: > > <package>-1.0-incubator-M2 looks good for me. > > > > +1 from me. > > > On 05/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> Hi everyone, > >> > >> We need to choose a full name for the forthcoming release, so I've put > a > >> few > >> suggestions below - any favourite? > >> So far we've been referring to this release as M2 or Milestone 2 so all > >> the > >> suggestions below have M2 in them. > >> We don't have the Maven restriction to start with a number, but we may > >> want > >> to follow the Java naming for M2 (1.0-incubator-M2), alternatively we > >> could > >> follow the names from the first C++ release: tuscany_sca_cpp- > >> 0.1.incubating-M1 and tuscany_sdo_cpp-0.1.incubating-M1 > >> > >> Some alternatives are: > >> tuscany_sca_cpp-1.0-incubator-M2 > >> tuscany_sca_cpp-0.1.incubating-M2 > >> tuscany_sca_cpp-0.2.incubating-M2 > >> > >> Any preferences/better ideas? Mine would be the first in the list to > >> show > >> that we are at a similar level to the Java side ;-). > >> > >> Cheers > >> Andy > >> > >> > > > > > > > -- > Jean-Sebastien > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
