I agree.
Andy Piper wrote:
At 15:21 09/10/2006, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
In many cases building the sample does not actually prove anything as
they are not executed. This applies, for example, to the webapp-based
samples we have. When they are executed, we still don't know that
they run in the end-user environment - e.g. the standalone samples
that run from SCATestCase but which fail to run from the launcher.
Where they should be built/run is as part of an integration test
suite. We don't have that ATM.
Better samples that build and don't run than samples that don't build
at all IMO.
andy
_______________________________________________________________________
Notice: This email message, together with any attachments, may contain
information of BEA Systems, Inc., its subsidiaries and affiliated
entities, that may be confidential, proprietary, copyrighted and/or
legally privileged, and is intended solely for the use of the individual
or entity named in this message. If you are not the intended recipient,
and have received this message in error, please immediately return this
by email and then delete it.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
