2.4.3 is what we have working on Win. I'm sure 2.5 would be fine but it was pre-req'ing vc7.x and a particular .Net framework level... a right pain!
We will probably, no definitely, build our windows distros with vc7 as we think Python requires it. But then.. the Ruby extension won't compile with anything but VC6!!! (but we hacked our code so that we tricked Ruby into thinking we were on VC6... seems to work). So we are going with VC6, Python 2.4 and Ruby 1.8. Cheers, On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Pete Robbins wrote: > That looks good. I think Andy was going to generate/zip/sign/publish the > packages for the distros. I tried Python 2.5 on Windows but had to go > down > to 2.4 so we'll stick there! > > Cheers, > > > On 10/10/06, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Pete Robbins wrote: >> > Sounds about right. I need to add Ruby and Python extensions into the >> > windows command line build. Hopefully this will be done today. >> > >> > Cheers, >> > >> > >> > On 09/10/06, Andrew Borley <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> >> >> Hi all, >> >> >> >> Just a quick one to find out where we are with items for C++ M2 RC1. >> >> From recent commits I think the status is: >> >> >> >> SDO >> >> - Stdcxx as a build option on Linux and Windows - done, aside from >> >> Linux support, probably not going to include Linux support >> >> - Support for an identified level of the SDO spec (2.01) - readme >> >> updated, but needs checking >> >> >> >> SCA >> >> - CPP, WS, Python, Ruby builds in source & binary release - Linux: >> >> done. Windows: CPP & WS done, Python & Ruby to do >> >> - Support for an identified level of the SCA assembly (0.96) and C++ >> >> C&I specs (0.95) - readme updated, but needs checking & adding to. >> >> >> >> Samples >> >> - Calculator, PythonCalculator, RubyCalculator, BigBank, RubyBank - >> >> documentation & deploy scripts done, Calculator windows build script >> >> done, BigBank windows build script to do. >> >> >> >> Docs >> >> - How to build SDO (with or without stdcxx) and SCA - done >> >> - How to deploy WS service/module to Axis2C - done >> >> - How to build/run the samples for SDO/SCA - done >> >> - Describe the new SCA language extensions progamming models - done >> >> - Release notes - updated, needs checking/adding to (see above) >> >> - How to turn existing C and/or C++ code into an SCA component - >> >> updated the "How to create a C++ component" doc - is this sufficient? >> >> >> >> Deployment >> >> - Simplify and open our tuscany-root folder structure to allow people >> >> to choose the structure that best fits their environment - done >> >> >> >> Release Requirements >> >> - Update Licence text in source files to the new Apache wording - >> done >> >> >> >> >> >> Does that look about right to people? Any other updates? Anything >> >> else to >> >> go in? >> >> >> >> Cheers! >> >> >> >> Andy >> >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> >> >> >> > >> > >> >> Who has a complete environment to build a Linux distribution? >> >> I am able to generate a Linux distribution in the following environment: >> Redhat Enterprise Linux 4 (with a 2.6.9-34 kernel) >> Axis2c 0.94 >> Python 2.3.4 >> Ruby 1.8.1 >> PHP 5.1.6 >> httpd-2.2.3 >> Libxml2 2.6.20 >> >> My Python and Ruby installations are a little old, so I'll try to >> upgrade them to: >> Python 2.4.3 >> Ruby 1.8.5 >> later today... >> >> Do these levels look light to you for this release? Should we use >> different levels? >> >> I can help generate the distribution or just help with testing if >> somebody else has a better environment to build it (like a recent Fedora >> core for example). >> >> Let me know. Thanks. >> >> -- >> Jean-Sebastien >> >> >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >> >> > > Pete, Our emails just crossed :) I had just sent another email saying Python 2.5 instead of 2.4.3 (and actually just downloaded 2.5). But I'd understand if you'd prefer to stay on 2.4.3 on Linux to stay in sync with Windows? I'm happy with that, on one hand Python 2.5 is the latest production release, but on the other hand it is very recent so I'm not sure if many people are already using it. Let me know which one you prefer to use for the binary distro (given that people can always build with the specific level they want from the source distro). Andy, if you are actually building the official distros on your machine please let me know which levels you are using. I'll use the same levels for testing then. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Pete
