I have checked in code to complete a minimal implementation of
conversational services, including a sample adapted from the C&I
spec. Still not using UUID for conversation ids, need to change.
Rick, you can go ahead and test it (I did not include the sample
in the main pom, you can run it from its own dir though).
On 11/11/06, Jim Marino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On Nov 11, 2006, at 6:16 AM, Ignacio Silva-Lepe wrote:
> The C&I spec defines a conversational interface as annotated with
>
> @Scope("session")
>
> but since we are also considering HTTP Session scopes, it seems
> that using @Scope("CONVERSATIONAL") would make things
> clearer. Notice that earlier in the spec (sec 1.2.1.4) the annotation
> @Scope("CONVERSATION") is used in passing, so it looks like
> the spec needs to be revised anyway.
I think I may have missed a couple of places in the spec where things
should have been changed from "session" to "conversation". We also
need a description for scopes to be placed back in the Java C&I spec
(it was originally in, moved to Assembly, and then the spec group
decided to move it back to the respective C&I specs) so I'll include
this in that proposal.
Jim
> For the current SCA/Java implementation of conversational services
> just getting under way, the current thought is to use
> @Scope("CONVERSATIONAL")
>
> On 11/11/06, Pete Robbins <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>> Quick question: Is there an annotation that marks an interface as
>> conversational?
>>
>> Cheers,
>>
>> --
>> Pete
>>
>>
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]