Frank, Do you mind my opening a JIRA to track this requirement? I think the users may need "commonj.sdo/xml" namespace for defining SDO types programmatically to control the format of XML serialization. Fuhwei
Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Hi Fuhwei, you are right that we should preregister commonj.sdo/xml. We haven't really needed it for anything before now ... that's the only reason we don't have it already. Frank. Fuhwei Lwo wrote on 12/04/2006 09:15:58 AM: > I found the current Java SDO runtime has natively registered and > supported "commonj.sdo" and "commonj.sdo/java" data model but I > didn't see "commonj.sdo/xml" was registered and supported. > Shouldn't "commonj.sdo/xml" be part of SDO's core model? > > Thanks in advance. --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
