Thanks for the pointer Ray, It looks like a great start... Do you (all) think we should assume SCA is being used/ the desired solution ? The scenarios would, I hope, show how SCA helps solve a problem, though they could be useful to see if/where SCA has gaps and where Tuscany can provide value beyond being a pure SCA implementation.
I was thinking : Technology independent scenario -> to how/if SCA & Tuscany supports it -> example(s) of how to do it This could help identify any SCA/Tuscany gap and help give Tuscany developers an indication of the complexity of performing a task / solving a problem. For example, if we discover that to perform a scenario using Tuscany required 39 steps and multiple decision points it might be a good area for simplification (or failing that tools). However, if the consensus is that SCA is the starting then I'm happy to go along with this. WDYT ? Cheers, Dan On 16/01/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1. I think it would be useful to define a set of SOA scenarios that Tusany is developed to support. Overtime, these senarios can be implemented using Tuscany and become part of the integration suite. We can use them as one way to measure the functional completeness for Tuscany. FYI: There are some initial efforts documented at the following wiki page: http://wiki.apache.org/ws/Tuscany/TuscanyJava/Scenarios Thanks, Raymond ----- Original Message ----- From: "Dan Murphy" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: "Tuscany Developers" <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>; "Tuscany Users" <tuscany-user@ws.apache.org> Sent: Monday, January 15, 2007 4:39 AM Subject: SOA Scenarios > Hi, > There have been a number of postings about scenarios. For example: > > - In July > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg04490.html > about JSF using Tuscany > - In Nov > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg00319.htmlas > part of the what next for C++ > - More recently > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user@ws.apache.org/msg00416.htmland > - http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg12818.html > > Would it be useful to document and maintain a set of scenarios that > Tuscany > does/will support? > > These could be used to validate and help guide what get developed, rather > than relying "what next ?" postings (more permentant record). It could > also > be used to help identify complexity and completeness. Lastley it might > also > make it clearer to differenticate Tuscany from similar projects. Perhaps a > way to kick off would be to start gathering some user stories (rather than > more abstract scenarios) > > WDYT ? > > Cheers, > Dan > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
