I think @DataType can be optional for properties.
The DataBinding SPI provides a pluggable way to introspect the java type.
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, January 25, 2007 1:52 PM
Subject: Re: [jira] Commented: (TUSCANY-925) Complex properties not
supported
On Jan 25, 2007, at 1:35 PM, Raymond Feng wrote:
2) The component implementations express their requirements for the
property values using DataType. For java component, this can be achieved
by annotating the property with @DataType. This becomes extensions to
the componentType.
One question - is @DataType optional (with the default being a pure Java
type)? I've been assuming users would not need any annotation unless they
had requirements that were not inferable (e.g. like a requirement that
the value be an SDO).
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
