On Feb 8, 2007, at 4:42 PM, Jeremy Boynes wrote:
On Feb 8, 2007, at 3:26 PM, Meeraj Kunnumpurath wrote:
Also, for the JavaAtomicComponent, I am planning to pass in the
instance factory into the component from the builder, so that it
can be used later when createInstance is called. I am also
wondering with all these changes, is it worth simplifying the
PojoAtomicComponent and JavaAtomicComponent , since most of the
stuff in PojoConfiguration is going to be encapsulated in the
dynamically generated byte code for the instance factory. Maybe,
Jeremy has a view on this as well.
On the last note, it might be easier for now to add a new Component
implementation that was created by the PCB rather than trying to
retrofit PojoAtomicComponent.
I need something like this for the launched implementation type in
the client environment. I'll add a new implementation as a peer to
PAC and we can work out the builder for creating that.
--
Jeremy
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
