But if we have not done sufficient testing of the release that we feel
confident that users won't have to immediately wait for a new "release"
or go to snapshot what has it accomplished ?
Jim Marino wrote:
On Feb 22, 2007, at 7:49 AM, Rick Rineholt wrote:
I was going with the scenario that the release was out. Given that
unlike past releases we've done where we had major number of bindings
running and samples running to give a level of confidence that there
was a fair amount that could be done with the release code that
wouldn't require updating I'm not seeing quite seeing the value of
"release" code verses just published snapshots following this approach.
One of the values of the release is that it publishes a fixed SPI set
for people to develop against and validate. SNAPSHOT serves a
different purpose, to reflect the current status of HEAD, and as such
is constantly moving.
Jim
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
