[
https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1117?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12475092
]
Dan Murphy commented on TUSCANY-1117:
-------------------------------------
Hi Robbie,
Sorry fro the delay... got tied up end of last week and was ill earlier this
week....
I think the approach you have in these test cases looks good, however there is
a minor tweak I would like to suggest (I think we could do with a sperate
mailing list discussion for it).
The suggestion is that in sdo2.1-cts we have have the notion of core, extended
and underreivew. The reason for this is that I believe that other
implementations do not have any plans to implement some parts of the 2.1
specification. As such we could move some of these areas into the extended (for
example changesummaries spring to mind). As I said I think this needs a
seperate mailing list discussion, rather than via this jira.
In terms of this patch, and since you'll need to resubmit with the ASF flag
anyhow, would it make sense for test.sdo21.tests.util.TestUtil to be
test.sdo21.framework.XMLEqualityChecker (or similar) ?
Many thanks
Dan
> Updates to CTS test suite
> -------------------------
>
> Key: TUSCANY-1117
> URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1117
> Project: Tuscany
> Issue Type: Improvement
> Components: Java SDO Community Test Suite
> Reporter: Robbie Minshall
> Attachments: tuscany117_generalUpdatesToCTS_patch1.txt,
> tuscany117_patch2.zip
>
>
> Providing some updates to the CTS test suite.
> These updates make some modifications to existing test cases such as
> formatting ( eclipse code style ) and some test additions.
--
This message is automatically generated by JIRA.
-
You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online.
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
