Hi Simon, Essentually, as I see it, there are two main activities:
- Increase the types of data. The sample is just a trivial complex type, we should also test more complex data strucutres using either (or both) the SDO schemas (in the CTS & SDO Impl) and the interop tests (which I think you were one of the main authors of). - Add tests for interop between databindings In doing so I think we now need to test different styles of ws bindings. Since we need to generate the wrappers for doc/lit wrapped style ws binding, it means that we should also test rpc and straight doc/lit style as they could effect the way databinding transformations behave. I should be adding a patch for the first interop today (or tomorrow), so if you wanted add different ws binding styles to the current example that would be a good place to start. Thanks for you offer of help, Dan On 08/03/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 3/7/07, Dan Murphy <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Seems like Raymond generates the SDO representation of the wsdl as well as > the data in the the XSDs. This seems to be due to the use of wrapped style > of ws binding (or is it always necessary ?). Interesting thought that this > is required, personally I'd not have guessed it would be needed as I'd > assumed the wsdl is the domain of (transport) bindings rather than > databindings. > > Would like to make a couple of minor tweaks to what Raymond did (generate > the SDO objects in a non-default package) so we can do sdo<->jaxb between > client and service > > Thanks for helping chaps, > Dan > > On 07/03/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > On 3/7/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > If you try with the very latest SVN code both the JAXB and SDO WS > tests > > > should work now as Raymond made so fixes over night (works for me > now). > > > > > > I don't think the tests using the default binding will work right now > as > > > there's no default binding implemented yet. > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > On 3/7/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > Hi Dan, I've just spent a couple of days stepping through the SCA > code > > > and > > > > trying various tests to build up my knowledge a little. I note the > > > > databinding tests are being updated and you are asking for some help > ( > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/TUSCANY-1149). I just updated > > from > > > > SVN > > > > (for the integration branch) and ran up your tests and get the same > > > > result, > > > > i.e. the JAXB/WS combination passes while the other three fails. By > > way > > > of > > > > education for me I'm going to have a crack at debugging and see how > I > > > get > > > > one. Have you already solved this problem? Anything I should > > > particularly > > > > look out for in terms of configuring and debugging the tests? > > > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > Hi Ant > > > > Yes, thanks, I just discovered that. I went back and did a mvn clean and > a > > rebuild and now I see both the sdo and jaxb ws tests working now. > > > > Simon > > > Dan By way of education am just digging into what gets generated and used in your sample so I will be back here with questions shortly:-) From your comments you have tests in mind. Clearly there are various combinations of message, databinding and binding that we could test. We did some work a while back on interop schema that we could use and there is all the work in CTS. Can you give me a quick run down on what you plan. I can help write tests. Regards Simon
