Hi,
OK. I understand it's used for isolation purposes now. I'm busy fixing a
build break now, would you please add the support for @Test, @Before,
@After, @BeforeClass and @AfterClass for JUnit 4.x using reflections :-)?
Thanks,
Raymond
----- Original Message -----
From: "Jean-Sebastien Delfino" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org>
Sent: Thursday, March 08, 2007 11:44 AM
Subject: Re: [sca-java-integration-branch] Moving to maven-surefire-plugin
2.3 and JUnit 4.2
[snip]
Raymond Feng wrote:
2) When I try to port the SCATestCaseRunner to support JUnit 4.x
annotations, I found it fairly cumbersome to use java reflection to
access org.junit.* classes and annotations. Can we add JUnit as a compile
time dependency? If we don't like to have it in the core, maybe we should
keep it in the "tuscany-test" module.
Thanks,
Raymond
The runner is using reflection to allow the test case to be loaded and
executed in a completely isolated classloader, sharing only the JRE with
the classloader used to load the runner. Adding a compile dependency to
junit will not help here, but there may be a better way to avoid
reflection. Any thoughts?
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
