Quick minor thing, while taking a look at your manifest file inside sdo-impl, it still says : Implementation-Version: incubating-M1....
On 3/14/07, kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Currently there are 8 JIRAs targeted for the SDO Java M3 release TUSCANY-901 jar Manifests require Application-Vendor-Id TUSCANY-1021 CopyHelper and EqualityHelper should handle ChangeSummary TUSCANY-1096 Exception thrown when reference with many multiplicity to the element of anyType TUSCANY-1109 TypeHelperImpl#getType(Class) queries wrong scope ( EPackage.Registry.INSTANCE) and misses delegate scopes TUSCANY-1127 ObtainingDataGraphFromXml, and maybe other samples, incorrectly accessing xsd:any content TUSCANY-1164 Container of root object is non-null after endLogging() TUSCANY-1167 SDO Codegen generates bad code when the noNotification option is used TUSCANY-1171 SDO Java M3 Release 901 was raised due to comments on M2 and 1171 is clearly M3 specific, but it's not clear that any of the others are fundamental to the release. I propose to re-target the others to SDO-Java-Mx unless anyone objects. In the interests of getting a release candidate out soon, I'll probably manually fix up the RC jars to satisfy 901, and then address the issue properly between now and the final release candidate. If anyone can point to or provide the maven solution to getting this sorted before I get to look at it that would be great. If these remaining JIRAs or any others get fixed between now and the final release candidate, then I can't see any reason why they shouldn't by default be marked as targeting SDO-Java-M3 and included in the release. -- Reasonable? Kelvin.
-- Luciano Resende http://people.apache.org/~lresende