Brian, this would be an issue for the SDO spec, but I don't think it's necessary, since you can use
Type type =helperContext1.getTypeHelper().getType(uri, name); and then use dataGraph.createRootObject(type); the root object will then provide the type scope context for subsequent updates to the graph Regards, Kelvin. On 20/03/07, Brian Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Has there already been discussion about adding a HelperContext parm for methods which take URI and name as input? It seems necessary to me. For example, if you've created a Type with helperContext1.getXSDHelper().define() or helperContext1.getTypeHelper().define(), then DataGraph.createRootObject(URI, name) will be unaware of the Types created in the helperContext1 scope.
