Jeremy, Please allow time for discussion. Please withdraw this vote as it is getting hijacked because discussion is not over yet.
thanks, dims On 3/20/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raymond Feng wrote: > Hi, > > Here's my vote. > > [X] +1 we should do this > [ ] -1 keep things as they are > > The vote is based on my understanding of the benefits of > interface-based models as follows. > > 1) Better pluggability for the model implementation and loading: We > can easily generate the model and loading code using Java/XML binding > frameworks such as JAXB, SDO and XMLBeans. > > 2) Better relationship between model objects: One java class can > implement multiple interfaces, for example, we can use "Extensible" > interface to represent the SCDL extensibilities and "Promotable" to > represent models eligible for promotion. > > 3) Better isolation for dependencies: Other modules only have to > depend on the model interfaces for compilation. We don't have to > release the model interfaces if we just have to fix issues in the > implementation classes without breaking the contract. > > 4) Simpler interface-based mocking for unit tests > > 5) Other projects use interface-based modeling such as Axiom, DOM, > WSDL4J and Woden > > Thanks, > Raymond > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Jeremy Boynes" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> > Sent: Tuesday, March 20, 2007 7:23 AM > Subject: [VOTE] Rewrite kernel model to be based on interfaces > > >> The current model is based on simple POJOs. Sebastien has proposed >> rewriting the configuration model to be based on interfaces with >> separate implementation and factory classes. This will have a major >> impact on the kernel code and all extensions. This vote is not about >> what is in the model, it's is about how the model itself is implemented. >> >> [ ] +1 we should do this >> [ ] -1 keep things as they are >> >> If I was going to vote I would probably vote +1 since I'm doing this work :) but I'm not ready to vote on it yet, as I'm not sure why a vote thread popped up so quickly, independent of the thread I started yesterday to get input from our community and have a technical discussion on the subject: http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org/msg15725.html -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
-- Davanum Srinivas :: http://wso2.org/ :: Oxygen for Web Services Developers --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
