Raymond,
I've wondered that before too. Your case 2 would have been answered by the
SCA spec if the @Reference annotation were defined to be, annotated itself
with:
java.lang.annotation.Inherited. Since it's not annotated, I'm not sure
what to think from the SCA perspective, (though it's clear what the Java
lang perspective is).
On 3/23/07, Raymond Feng <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi,
If I have component implementation class like this:
Case 1:
public class MyServiceImpl implements MyService {
private YourService yourService;
public void setYourService(YourService yourService) {
this.yourService = yourService;
}
}
public interface MyService {
@Reference
void setYourService(YourService yourService);
}
Q1: Should "yourService" be treated as a reference?
Case 2:
public class MyServiceImpl extends MyServiceBaseImpl {
public void setYourService(YourService yourService) {
super.setYourService(yourService);
// Do addtional things here
}
}
public class MyServiceBaseImpl {
protected YourService yourService;
@Reference
public void setYourService(YourService yourService) {
this.yourService = yourService;
}
}
Q2: Should "yourService" be treated as a reference?
Am I crazy?
Thanks,
Raymond
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
