Paul Golick <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote on 04/02/2007 01:23:21 PM: [snip]
> Is it accurate to categorize the code as "common to Apache Tuscany and to > Eclipse EMF"? or would you prefer a different description? We won't have exactly the same code in both projects. The two EMF classes, described below, are "code that IBM has contributed to both Eclipse EMF and Apache Tuscany". Thanks, Frank. [snip] > Frank Budinsky <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > 2007-03-22 09:01 AM > Please respond to > tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > > > To > tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > cc > > Subject > Re: SDO IP Issues, was: SDO Java M3 Release Candidate RC1 > > > > > > > Thank goodness, common sense applies :-) > > Now we can proceed with the release candidate. > > Thanks, > Frank. > > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote on 03/21/2007 05:27:35 PM: > > > On 3/21/07, Jeremy Boynes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On Mar 20, 2007, at 1:11 PM, Frank Budinsky wrote: > > > > > > > I've confirmed that IBM, the copyright holder, gives permission to > > > > Apache > > > > to reuse the two EMF files in question. > > > > > > Thanks for confirming this. > > > > > > > > > > > I've opened TUSCANY-1185 to contribute the two base classes, > > > > provided in > > > > an attachment. > > > > > > > > Jeremy, let me know if this is good enough for you, or if you still > > > > want > > > > me to remove the Tuscany subclasses and resubmit them. > > > > > > I can't ack this for the ASF - that has to be done by an Officer as > > > described in the IP Clearance process. They would probably want > > > something official from IBM (Software Grant). > > > > I am a director of the ASF. > > > > Apparently the original copyright holder desires to contribute the > > same code to two different places under two different licenses. They > > are certainly within their rights to do so. The contribution under > > the other license isn't particularly relevant to me. Now, concerning > > the contribution which is presumably being made in good faith under > > the ASF license to the Tuscany project, I see no ASF wide legal or > > policy issue here, which means that the only remaining issue a > > technical one, namely whether or not tuscany wishes to accept this > > code. > > > > Now, if anybody has any reason to believe that the assertion of > > authorship is false (i.e., if there are Eclipse CVS or SVN logs which > > show contributions by others), then the issue is an entirely different > > one... > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
