Yes, this looks fine for SDO. The parent artifact that we voted on recently http://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/tags/java/pom/parent/2/pom.xml had already made this switch, and so my SDO M3 release candidates already reference the parent in the "incubating" style. I'll make the changes to SDO poms in the trunk to reflect the change.
Regards, Kelvin. On 16/04/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Luciano Resende wrote: > Hi All > > After couple complains about build failures, and couple hours > investigating the multiple complains on the dev-list [1][2], looks > like all the issues are being caused due to our artifacts having two > set of artifact versions : <version>2-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version> > and <version>2-incubator-SNAPSHOT</version>.After I changed everything > locally to use the same version as the one defined in the > java/pom/parent <version>2-incubating-SNAPSHOT</version>, the whole > build started to work and the issues reported are gone. > > So, in order to avoid future complains, I'd like to propose changes > to remaining artifacts that are using > <version>2-incubator-SNAPSHOT</version> version. Note that I have > already started changing the DAS artifact versions as described in > [3]. And I have attached a file containing the remaining places that > need changes. > > If people are OK with proposed changes, particularly the SDO team, > I'd like to go ahead and commit my local changes asap. > > [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg16509.html > [2] > http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00822.html > <http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-user%40ws.apache.org/msg00822.html> > [3] http://www.mail-archive.com/tuscany-dev%40ws.apache.org/msg16625.html > > -- > Luciano Resende > http://people.apache.org/~lresende <http://people.apache.org/%7Elresende > > ------------------------------------------------------------------------ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] +1 from me. I think that the recommendation for artifacts from incubating projects is *-incubating-* (although I can't find the discussion thread right now I remember I had seen a discussion on this a while ago). The SCA artifacts are already *-incubating-*, looks like you're fixing the DAS artifacts, we need the folks working on SDO to say if they're OK with this change. -- Jean-Sebastien --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
