Excellent thanks, thats type type feedback I was looking for! Comments in line...
On 4/30/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: <snip/> I have a few questions and suggestions.
- tuscany-sca.jar contains .svn directories, I guess they should be removed from the JAR.
I can't see these, i could just be blind or maybe its something different about our environments could you give an example of what the file names are? - Also 2 empty xsds at the root of the JAR and com.example packages,
they must be coming from one of the examples?
The com.example.* files are coming from the databinding-jaxb and databinding-sdo modules, we need to fix those modules but I'm not sure how. It looks like the jaxb and sdo plugins need to some way to say they're test resources. Any one know how to fix this? I can't see the 2 empty xsds, something different about our environments again? - I guess we're going to rename this to sca-1.0-beta1-incubating? Yes, the name should be being picked up from the pom, but i'll test it does change. (Using the current format the name would be 1.0-incubating-beta1, do we really want 1.0-beta1-incubating?) - Like you said above, we'll have to include the javadoc for our SPIs. Yes, I guess I can add that in now even though the SPIs aren't done by just including the tuscany-core-spi module javadoc. Is javadoc for just these two modules enough (sca-api and core-spi). I've added this now, are there other modules we want javadoc for? - How did you produce the single META-INF/services/...ModuleActivator
file? is it generated?
This is done in the java/sca/distribution/bundle project using the Maven Shade plugin, see in the pom.xml the shade config where a Shade AppendingTransformer is used to merge all the ModuleActivator files into one. No doc at all about the Shade plugin that I could find, I got this from looking at the CXF build and the Shade plugin source code.
- We have two different servlet-api JARs, should we pick one?
Fixed. The 6.0.10 one was coming from the http-tomcat module so i've added exclusions in that pom.xml. - Could we have, in the bin distro, a tuscany-sca-src.jar containing all
the source code for the classes in tuscany-sca.jar?
Thats a good idea, I'm not sure how though. The tuscany-sca.jar is built from all the <dependency> elements listed in the distribution/bundle/pom.xml, I could make a src jar by just zipping up everything in sca/modules but it may end up including more than is in the tuscany-sca.jar. Anyone have any better ideas on how to do this? - How about renaming tuscany-sca.jar to tuscany-sca-all.jar, or any name
indicating that it's all the tuscany code?
OK, done. - The NOTICE will have to be updated as it contains obsolete dependencies. Yep. Over the next days I'll trawl through all the license and notice files to make sure they're correct. - I think it would be great to have Ant build scripts for some of the
samples, as not everybody is using Maven.
Me too, I'll try to get one going today. Should we have all the samples have both maven and Ant build scripts, or just Ant, or some samples have Ant and others have Maven? - Pre-built sample JARs would be great too, but not as important if we
have a simple Ant build for the samples.
There are pre-built sample jars in the sample target directory, eg, samples\calculator\target\tuscany- sample-calculator-1.0-incubating-SNAPSHOT.jar I've updated the distribution build scripts with the above changes now. ...ant
