Ok, I've started to use 0.90 for the name for now. Can easily change it if something better comes up.
...ant On 5/3/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 for 0.90 - Venkat On 5/2/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > It would be good to choose a name soon so we can start completing all the > readme's and release notes etc, there doesn't seem much consensus on beta1 > so how about 0.90? That sounds closer to 1.0 than M3 or alpha and still > gives space for more releases before the final 1.0. > > ...ant > > On 5/1/07, Bert Lamb <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I realize I'm a bit late to this conversation, I'm just now getting > > mostly unpacked from a move to Somerville, MA. I agree with Simon in > > that we should be careful what we call "beta". I know that we all > > would like to get to beta quality code and features as soon as we can, > > but I don't think we are there yet nor will we be there by JavaOne. > > What we currently have in the trunk I think is a much more manageable > > code base but it actually has fewer features, if I'm not mistaken, > > than M2 had. So, my vote, if I had a binding one, would be for 3, > > with a name of M3 or maybe alpha. > > > > -Bert > > > > On 4/25/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 4/24/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > <snip/> > > > > > > So I think it comes down to whether it is more important to put > > > > something out by JavaOne (in which case I'd be hesitant to call it > > > > "beta") or whether it is more important to attain a true "beta" > level > > > > of quality even if that takes a little bit longer. > > > > > > > > > I guess a lot comes down to everyones slightly different perceptions > as > > to > > > what the name "beta" implies, what do others think about this? Should > > we: > > > > > > 1) continue aiming for a beta1 release around JavaOne timeframe > > > 2) continue with a beta1 release but take a bit more time > > > 3) aim for a release around JavaOne timeframe but change to a > non-"beta" > > > release name, alpha-x or maybe a numeric like 0.90? > > > > > > I probably favor (2) as looking at things people have said they'd like > > to > > > get done it seems unlikely to me we'll be ready by JavaOne anyway. > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > >
