Hi, I am just about to start the next iteration of renaming. So here is another request to refrain from commits till I come back on the ML. Thanks again for co-operating :)
- Venkat On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi, thank you all for being really patient. This iteration of refactoring is now over and committed. But looks like I am going to come back with similar requests if people are ok to name the other modules as well Thanks - Venkat On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi.. I have made some progress with the renaming. Since there are > changes across modules, I request that there are no commits till I get back > on the ML and state that is ok to commit. > > Thanks > > - Venkat > > On 5/11/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED] > wrote: > > > > Ok. I am starting with the renaming of the packages for the core-spi > > module. Thanks > > > > - Venkat > > > > On 5/11/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > +1 to starting with the package renames on Friday. > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > On 5/10/07, Venkata Krishnan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > +1 for controlled commits. If people will ensure no commits on > > > Thursday > > > > after about 24.00Hrs Pacific Time (US and Canada), I can go ahead > > > and > > > > change > > > > the core-spi packages to include 'sca'. Ant, please let me know > > > if there > > > > are other things that I can help with. I am also going to start > > > looking > > > > at > > > > getting the spec-api itest to work. > > > > > > > > Thanks > > > > > > > > - Venkat > > > > > > > > On 5/9/07, ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > On 5/8/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > Raymond Feng wrote: > > > > > > > Hi, > > > > > > > > > > > > > > I tried a bit to rename some of the packages (not adding sca > > > yet) > > > > but > > > > > > > I just realized that it became a bit out of control with the > > > flood > > > > of > > > > > > > check-ins. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Maybe the best way is that we agree on the naming convention > > > for the > > > > > > > core-spi and core and then have one person to do all the > > > refactoring > > > > > > > in one shot once we see a functionally stable code base. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > > > Raymond > > > > > > > > > > > > > > ----- Original Message ----- From: "Venkata Krishnan" > > > > > > > < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > > > > > To: < tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> > > > > > > > Sent: Friday, May 04, 2007 10:48 PM > > > > > > > Subject: Re: Status of Java SCA 0.90 release > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> Hi.. .what about the workitem related to renaming the > > > core-spi to > > > > > > >> include > > > > > > >> 'sca' for packages. Is it a good time to do this ? Thanks > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> - Venkat > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> On 5/4/07, Simon Laws < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> On 5/4/07, Jean-Sebastien Delfino < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > > > wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > ant elder wrote: > > > > > > >>> > > There's been a lot of progress, things are starting to > > > look > > > > good > > > > > > >>> and > > > > > > >>> > most > > > > > > >>> > > things on the wiki page ( > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/Java+SCA+Next+Release+Contents > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > ) > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > look like they're nearing completion. So I think what > > > we > > > > should > > > > > > >>> do is > > > > > > >>> > > aim at > > > > > > >>> > > creating an SVN branch for the release around Tuesday > > > next > > > > week, > > > > > > >>> > > start > > > > > > >>> > > being > > > > > > >>> > > more controlled about what changes go into the branch > > > and > > > > start > > > > > > >>> > > publishing > > > > > > >>> > > candidate distributions from that, then when we think > > > it looks > > > > > > >>> ok > > vote > > > > > > >>> > on > > > > > > >>> > > the final release candidate from that, hopefully by > > > the end of > > > > > > next > > > > > > >>> > week. > > > > > > >>> > > Does this sound ok to everyone? It does mean most > > > changes > > > > anyone > > > > > > >>> > > wants > > > > > > >>> > in > > > > > > >>> > > should be tried to be committed by Tuesday. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > The latest distribution downloads to try out are > > > available at: > > > > > > >>> > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/<http://people.apache.org/%7Eantelder/tuscany/latest/> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > There's now a Java-SCA-0.90 version in Jira so any > > > bugs found > > > > or > > > > > > >>> things > > > > > > >>> > > people want to get done should be added there: > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > https://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > ...ant > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > +1 from me. Like you said a lot of what we had on the > > > Wiki are > > > > > near > > > > > > >>> > completion. One of the most important items I think is > > > to > > > > complete > > > > > > >>> the > > > > > > >>> > clean up of the code base and simplify further some of > > > our > > > > > > interfaces > > > > > > >>> > for extensions, but Tuesday looks reasonable to me. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > -- > > > > > > >>> > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > >>> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >>> > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > > >>> > Sounds like a good timescale to me. Gives time to finish > > > the > > > > > sample > > > > > > >>> builds > > > > > > >>> and readmes. > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >>> Simon > > > > > > >>> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > There has been many commits and good progress the last few > > > days, so I > > > > > > spent a little bit of time checking the status of the trunk. > > > > > > > > > > > > Here's a summary of what I found: > > > > > > - The code cleanup is almost complete, I think there's a > > > little bit > > > > work > > > > > > left to refactor one last .spi. package, remove a few dead > > > classes, > > > > also > > > > > > it looks like Raymond has started to clean up the Scope > > > registry and > > > > > > WorkContext I'm not sure if it's finished or not. > > > > > > - The Java, Script and RMI extensions are now stable, as well > > > as the > > > > > > sample implementation, binding, and data binding extensions. > > > > > > - It looks like we have a reasonable Web app story with a > > > servlet > > > > > > context listener, but it may require a little bit of cleanup > > > to avoid > > > > > > confusion with sca-contribution.xml . I'm also not sure if it > > > allows to > > > > > > expose Web Services from a Web app, or if we even want to do > > > that now. > > > > > > > > > > > > Main todo's that I could think of: > > > > > > - Port the Web Service binding extension to the latest code, > > > as it's > > > > > > really important to have, and is also used by many integration > > > tests. > > > > > > - Run RAT and check licenses and notices. > > > > > > - Check why the itest/spec-api test cases are failing. > > > > > > - Create a JAR containing the source of our runtime, to help > > > debugging > > > > > > in an IDE. > > > > > > - Are the samples build.xml finished? > > > > > > - I have ported the Spring extension to the latest code but > > > need to do > > > > a > > > > > > little bit of cleanup tomorrow before committing it. > > > > > > - I'm not sure about the JSONRPC binding, wouldn't it be nice > > > to have > > > > it > > > > > > too? > > > > > > - Lazy loading of our modules to avoid loading too many > > > dependencies > > > > > > when using tuscany-sca-all.jar. > > > > > > - Rename the packages to *.sca.* but I would suggest to delay > > > this to > > > > a > > > > > > later point some time next week after our first RC. > > > > > > > > > > > > And there's probably a few more :) > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > Jean-Sebastien > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > We've made tons of progress on all these things so the release > > > is > > > > looking > > > > > really close to being ready and the time approaching to either > > > cut a > > > > > branch > > > > > or switch to a more controlled commit mode on the > > > trunk. Hopefully we > > > > > could > > > > > do this tomorrow, so this is just a fyi to start getting all > > > your last > > > > > minute changes in... > > > > > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > >
