You know, I quite liked it with the -webapp suffix and had been thinking about renaming the others to be that instead of -web. What do people think, isn't -webapp much more descriptive about what the samples are?
...ant On 5/22/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I have fixed a small issue on on the ajax binding, that was causing a NPE during server shutdown, and also renamed the chat sample application to follow the same pattern other web applications were using (e.g calculator-web). With this, here is my +1 to get the sample added to the build. On 5/21/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Ant > > The problem was due case mismatches on the case of the composite name > (chat versus Chat), after fixing, there was no requirement to have the > sca-deployables anymore. I have committed these changes + some small changes > to send the message when you press ENTER under revision #540345. > > BTW, any plans to get the binding and sample in the build ? > > > ---------- Forwarded message ---------- > From: ant elder < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: May 18, 2007 2:07 AM > Subject: Re: Java SCA 0.90 branch > To: tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org > > I've tried to use this with the ajax chat sample but can't get it to work. I > suppose as the calculator-web sample works this is probably a problem with > the sample but I can't see anything wrong, can any one else? I've moved the > chat sample and binding-ajax to trunk, but they're not in the build so you > need to build them separately, then the chat sample only works with the > sca-deployables directory, delete that and it should use the > sca-contribution.xml file but that seems to be ignored, can anyone see why? > > ...ant > > On 5/17/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > I have committed to trunk, under revision # r539127 a fix to place > > sca-contribution on the right location in a war file, this also had a > > small > > change on the host-webapp module in order to properly find the root of the > > contribution. Should these changes be merged into the branch ? What's the > > right process to do this ? Just merge ? or via JIRA ? > > > > On 5/17/07, ant elder <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > The Tuscany Java SCA 0.90 release branch is available now: > > > > > > https://svn.apache.org/repos/asf/incubator/tuscany/branches/sca-java-0.90/ > > > > > > It all seems to build cleanly and the samples work, the source and > > binary > > > distributions created from that are available at: > > > http://people.apache.org/~antelder/tuscany/latest/ > > > > > > All going well I'll make an official RC from that to vote on tomorrow, > > be > > > great if anyone could give it a try to test things out before then. > > > > > > There's still some open JIRA's: > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&mode=hide&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=priority&resolution=-1&pid=12310210&fixfor=12312478 > > > > > > The branch version is 0.90-incubating-SNAPSHOT and the final release > > will > > > be > > > 0.90-incubating, does that sound ok? > > > > > > And we still need to finish the release notes... > > > > > > ...ant > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ -- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
