[snip]
scabooz wrote:
Why do we think that a Domain base URI is physically addressable and
known to a DNS?
From the assembly spec:
2357 Base Domain URI for a scheme. An SCA domain should define a base
URI for each
2358 hierarchical URI scheme on which it intends to provide services.
2359 For example: the HTTP and HTTPS schemes would each have their own
base URI defined for the
2360 domain. An example of a scheme that is not hierarchical, and
therefore will have no base URI is
2361 the “jms:” scheme.
I see it as a level of indirection used to address
"things" in an assembly. These URIs would need to be mapped (by
binding components to runtimes at deployment time) to something concrete.
Are http:// and https:// concrete enough? :)
--
Jean-Sebastien
---------------------------------------------------------------------
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
