Yes, I understand the purpose, but I also understand that the ACL of the website has changed since that time, that's why I was proposing move it to the regular wiki, where more people would have access to contribute to these documents. And yes, if we feel these documents are ready to be published to the website, we should link them from the documentation page and move them out of the "work in progress" page.
On 7/6/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Purpose of the 'work in progress folder' was just what you mentioned below. It's been a while since that folder was created. Perhaps we should look at the content and figure out what is mature enough to be added to the website before we move everything back to TuscanyWiki. On 7/6/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Following a related topic, should we move all the "work in progress" > documents that are child pages from [1] from the website to the wiki. > I think this would allow for more collaboration and help from other > members of the community. > > [1] > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANY/SCA+Java+Work-In-Progress > > On 7/2/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 That's what I was thinking about... sorry if it was causing any > confusion... > > > > On 7/2/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 7/2/07, haleh mahbod <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I agree with Simon Nash that we need a manual copy of the 'whole' > website > > > > on > > > > TuscanyWiki since otherwise it will be very difficult for those who > are > > > > not > > > > committers to see what their changes look like. I re-organized the > wiki > > > > before it got locked and I would have not been able to do it if I > could > > > > not > > > > see how my changes affected the navigation and flow of things. > > > > > > > > Tuscany wiki was organized in such a way that all related > documentation > > > > for > > > > each subproject appeared under that subproject and there were two > > > > categories > > > > under documentation 1) Completed documentation 2) work in progress > > > > It would be good to maintain this for clarity. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 7/1/07, Luciano Resende <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > I'd say, SCA Native Project would be on the same level of SCA Java > > > > > Project. I think what we have today on the website is similar to > this, > > > > > but it gives the distinction between Java/C++ in a deeper level, > and > > > > > for the tuscanywiki space, i think we can avoid this extra level. > The > > > > > main goal here is group related information together in a > organized > > > > > way, and try to avoid content to be put directly on the root level > of > > > > > the tuscanywiki. > > > > > > > > > > The TuscanyWiki space already have part of what I described, but > not > > > > > many content, other then the copy of the old website is available > as > > > > > of now. > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > On 7/1/07, Mike Edwards <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > Luciano, > > > > > > > > > > > > How does this compare with the existing structure? This seems > to > > > > > > approach things from a "Java" perspective rather than an "SCA" / > "SDO" > > > > > > perspective - is that right? > > > > > > > > > > > > It might be useful to create an example of what you mean in the > > > > > > TuscanyWiki psace... > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Yours, Mike. > > > > > > > > > > > > Luciano Resende wrote: > > > > > > > I'd like to propose using a structure similar to the one > described > > > > > > > below to group documents together and make it easier to find > related > > > > > > > information. It's probably good not to have very deep > hierarchy, and > > > > > > > maybe start grouping things on a specific level via page name > (e.g > > > > > > > distribution-import-export, distribution-model, etc) > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SCA Java Project > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > |--- SCA related Documents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > SDO Java Project > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > |--- SDO related Documents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > DAS Java Project > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > |--- DAS related Documents > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Infrastructure > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > |--- Infra related Documents such as builds, sync, etc > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Website > > > > > > > | > > > > > > > |--- Website related documents and old website copy > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Thoughts ? > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 6/30/07, Simon Laws <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > > > >> On 6/15/07, Simon Nash <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > I'd like to retain the copied pages from the Tuscany web > > > > site. As > > > > > > >> Venkat > > > > > > >> > said, this makes it easy for non-committers to develop and > > > > preview > > > > > > >> > proposed > > > > > > >> > updates to the Web site. I agree that it would be good to > create > > > > a > > > > > new > > > > > > >> > front page for the Wiki, with the copied Web site home page > > > > > > >> > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home > > > > > > >> > linked from the TUSCANYWIKI front page. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Simon > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > Simon Laws wrote: > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > I agree. Looking at it now it is confusing with the > complete > > > > copy > > > > > > >> of the > > > > > > >> > > web > > > > > > >> > > site material presented on the front page. It's not clear > where > > > > > the > > > > > > >> > > definitive source of this material is. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > +1 to the proposal for changing the front page of > TUSCANYWIKI. > > > > I > > > > > > >> would > > > > > > >> > have > > > > > > >> > > thought we can just start with a subpage of TUSCANYWIKI > for > > > > "main > > > > > > >> site > > > > > > >> > > pages > > > > > > >> > > in preparation". Everthing else is wiki content with an > > > > > > >> organization of > > > > > > >> > our > > > > > > >> > > choosing. > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Regards > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > Simon > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > >> > To unsubscribe, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >> > For additional commands, e-mail: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> I've had a go at reorganizing the front page of the wiki. But > it's > > > > a > > > > > > >> wiki so > > > > > > >> if you don't like it.... > > > > > > >> > > > > > > >> Simon > > > > > > >> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > Luciano Resende > > > > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > > > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > > > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > There is a manual copy of the website on the wiki - see the > link"Tuscany > > > Website Pages In > > > Preparation< > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Manual+Copy+Of+The+Tuscany+Website > >" > > > at the bottom of the wiki front page ( > > > http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/TUSCANYWIKI/Home). I think > that > > > that is an apporpriate place to do web page preparation work. > > > > > > What I thought Luciano was proposing was a simple organization of any > wiki > > > pages that are not intended to be part of the web site. It's very > useful to > > > have the wiki space for creating arbitrary pages where we can record > > > information about ongoing work. This doesn't mean these pages will > ever > > > necessarily make it to the web site. > > > > > > Simon > > > > > > > > > -- > > Luciano Resende > > Apache Tuscany Committer > > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > > > > -- > Luciano Resende > Apache Tuscany Committer > http://people.apache.org/~lresende > http://lresende.blogspot.com/ > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
-- Luciano Resende Apache Tuscany Committer http://people.apache.org/~lresende http://lresende.blogspot.com/ --------------------------------------------------------------------- To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
