+1. :-) ----- Original Message ----- From: "Mike Edwards" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> To: <tuscany-dev@ws.apache.org> Sent: Friday, July 06, 2007 9:34 PM Subject: Need spec defined Databindings? Was: (TUSCANY-824) DataBinding: Is it a concern of Programming Model vs. Assembly?
> Folks, > > OK, finally, I bite ;-) > > The question for me is whether we need the SCA (Java) spec to define > some standard metadata (typically annotations) for databindings of > services & references. > > I make the assumption that for much of the time, it is possible to work > out the required databinding simply by inspection of the types of the > parameters involved. If you find an SDO object, if you find a JAXB > object, etc. > > So is the real issue the case where mixed types of data objects turn up? > Or are there ambiguous cases where you can't tell what the kind of > object is? > > I suppose that we can take two views of cases like these: > > a) Don't go there, it's not valid. > > b) OK, annotate your code enough to tell us exactly what you expect to > happen. > > If we want to go down the second path, then I'm happy to carry back > requirements to the SCA Java WG, but I'd really like an appreciation of > just how common this case is likely to be. > > Views please.... > > > Yours, Mike. > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] >
