Hi Kelvin, You may want to consider the followings -
1429 - Without the fix, SDO R1.0 is completely broken when using the default helper context 1391 - Load/save XML with unknown features. The fix simply utilized EMF's existing option to handle malformed XML documents. Fuhwei kelvin goodson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: Raymond added a comment to the RC1 thread [1] expressing a wish that a couple of jiras be fixed in this release. [1] http://www.mail-archive.com/[EMAIL PROTECTED]/msg01352.html On 13/07/07, David Adcox wrote: > > Kelvin, > > I'm a bit late adding this to the pile, but I'd like to see that > T-1428 is included in the 1.0 release. The changes are somewhat small > and making the change now will reduce headaches down the road. > > On 6/11/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > Good suggestion Steffen. If you were able to open a Jira and dump into > it > > any thoughts you may have had about the details of how you see this > working > > that would be great. The more detail you put there, the more likely it > is > > that someone who wants to get their hands dirty would be likely to pick > it > > up; unless of course you have plans for doing it yourself. As an aside, > > it's always interesting to know the background to why a particular > feature > > is important to someone, so if you felt like commenting on your > scenarios > > that would benefit from this too, whether in the JIRA on or the > list, that > > would be great. > > > > For my part here are the things that I'd like to see done ... > > - reorganisation of the build to create release distributions in line > with > > the SCA release format > > - review and improvement of the samples and implementation of an > alternative > > simple approach to running the samples that does not involve running a > maven > > build > > - review and improvement of the website documentation > > > > In addition, some things I'd like to see being done, but I don't see as > > absolute prerequisites for a release are ... > > - creation of a further sdo sub-project that permits automated > exercising of > > the sdo plugin and java generator > > - more test cases > > > > In terms of JIRA's, we currently have 3 marked for the specific release > > [1], rather then the generic Java-SDO-Next bucket [2] that is the > > placeholder for Jiras not assigned to a release. > > TUSCANY-1317 , > > TUSCANY-1143 , > > TUSCANY-513 > > > > The first is there because the originator marked it for the > beta1, which it > > didn't make, but it looks well defined, so after the beta1 I changed > the > > fix release to the 1.0 release, but I don't think I'll have the > bandwidth to > > cover this. > > The second is there because I want it to be, and plan to tackle it. > > The third is there because the originator has provided a patch and I'm > in > > the process of committing it. > > > > In the light of my priorities above, having taken a scan through [2] in > > addition to 1143, I plan to look at ... > > > > TUSCANY-1122 TypeConversionTestCase fails for JDK 1.4.2 > > TUSCANY-1127 ObtainingDataGraphFromXml, and maybe other samples, > > incorrectly accessing xsd:any content > > TUSCANY-1284 Manifest version number in Java SDO Impl and Tools jars > > TUSCANY-257 recently added file Interface2JavaGenerator.java is not > > compatible with JDK 1.4 > > > > and there are a few others I have my eye on, e.g. 303, if all the above > > goes well. > > > > Regards, Kelvin. > > > > [1] > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12311542&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312521&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > [2] > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&fixfor=12312262&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC > > > > On 09/06/07, Steffen Glomb wrote: > > > > > > i would like to see support for typesafe collections in the xsd2java > > > generator. > > > > > > regards > > > Steffen > > > > > > On 6/8/07, kelvin goodson < [EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I'd like to draw the communities attention to this issue again > please. > > > > Thanks to David for responding with his requirements and with the > fix > > > > for > > > > 1223. I have some thoughts that I'm structuring at the moment on > what's > > > > important for a next release from my perspective that I'll post > > > > soon, but > > > > in general I'm just keen to get the good stuff that we have added > > > > recently > > > > out in a release that, as I said before from my perspective, > warrants > > > > the > > > > title of "1.0". With the Summer holiday season coming up, I'd like > to > > > > do > > > > this soon so that I can sun myself on a beach without that niggling > > > > feeling > > > > of things that ought to have been done ;-) > > > > > > > > What say you we put a stake in the ground of aiming for a SDO > 1.0release to > > > > be at the IPMC ratification stage by mid-July? > > > > > > > > So to that end I ask again, if you have requirements that you feel > are > > > > fundamental to the next release please raise them now; with the > caveat > > > > of > > > > course that the only way to be sure of getting your requirements > into > > > > the > > > > release is to step forward and supply the fixes. > > > > > > > > -- > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > On 23/05/07, David Adcox wrote: > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin, > > > > > > > > > > I would like to see the multiple namepace issue resolved in the > > > > > XSD2JavaGenerator tool. This issue is covered in JIRA 1223. > > > > > Optionally, making it available to the plugin (JIRA 303) would be > > > > > nice. JIRA 1143 is something that I need fixed, as well. So any > > > > > focus that can be given to that prior to this release would be > > > > > appreciated. > > > > > > > > > > In the spirit of cooperation, I'll be posting a first pass on 1223 > a > > > > > bit later in the week. > > > > > > > > > > Thanks, > > > > > David > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > On 5/21/07, kelvin goodson wrote: > > > > > > > > > > With the beta1 release of SDO Java announced, I have begun > thinking > > > > about > > > > > a > > > > > next release which I believe can be given the version tag > > > > 1.0-incubator > > > > > . We > > > > > have full coverage of the 2.1 SDO spec in the trunk now, and we > > > > currently > > > > > have 33 open JIRAs. > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > http://issues.apache.org/jira/secure/IssueNavigator.jspa?reset=true&&pid=12310210&status=1&status=3&status=4&component=12310660&component=12310973&component=12310802&sorter/field=issuekey&sorter/order=DESC&sorter/field=components&sorter/order=ASC&sorter/field=priority&sorter/order=DESC > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Please give feedback on those issues which are important to > you and, > > > > if > > > > > possible, step up to provide fixes for those issues. > > > > > > > > > > If we are to call this the 1.0 release then it ought to provide a > > > > really > > > > > good experience for the user. Please share your experiences about > > > > using > > > > > the > > > > > beta1 release and make suggestions or contributions to improve the > > > > next > > > > > one. > > > > > Aside from fixes to the code, key contributions would be to > improve > > > > the > > > > > instructions, the samples and the documentation (we already have > > > > > discussions going on about the shape of the release distributions > on > > > > > another > > > > > thread). > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > Kelvin. > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > > > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >
